When it comes to high-end drones, the Dji Mavic 3 and Inspire 2 are two of the most popular options. Both drones offer impressive features and capabilities, but which one is the better option for you?
In this article, we’ll compare the Dji Mavic 3 vs Inspire 2, so you can make an informed decision about which drone is right for you.
Construct & Design
There may not be much under this section for certain drone comparisons; so many recent drones are constructed on a variant of the folding leg system that Mavic 3 received from its predecessors and allows it to pack to just over the size of its fuselage neatly. However, the portability of the Inspire 2 contrasts with its size.
The Inspire 2’s feet and props are at the end of two ‘T’ shapes that meet in the middle of the fuselage, and these shift from landing position, where the feet are closer to the ground, to flight position, where the feet are above the camera’s vision, allowing it to be fully rotated. When packing away, the camera and gimbal are removed, and the legs can then be placed in a third middle position to fit as flatly as possible in the box.
This innovation has a purpose: a camera with interchangeable lenses that can be rotated independently and handled by a dedicated camera operator. At the same time, the drone is controlled by a pilot. Two IMU and dual batteries add to the machine’s risk tolerance (albeit the batteries are also a budgeting problem!). At the same time, a small, low-quality FPV camera is built-in and remains forward-facing.
The unsymmetrical twin camera gimbal, which lends individuality to the Mavic 3 Cine, is its most distinctive design characteristic. The secondary camera is a lower-quality zoom than the primary lens, giving you more options than automatic cropping from a broad photo.
In terms of recording, the Inspire 2 features a replaceable SSD card slot on the back that must be purchased from DJI.
Maneuverability & Speed
Both of these drones are pretty agile, which is why it’s a little more surprising when the 3-4kg (8 pounds) Inspire 2 sprints to a top speed of 57mph rather than the still-impressive 42.5mph of the Mavic 3, just because it’s a little harder to envision.
The software had a minor impact on our experience; the default settings in DJI Fly, the newest app with the Mavic 3, seemed to have a slightly less even feel while doing subtle rotation movements.
There is still room to adjust this, as there has always been in Go 4, the program that comes with the Inspire 2, but the default settings appear to be more sophisticated. However, this could benefit the more significant, more traditional remote controller.
In practice, this is a dead heat. Both planes are ideal for capturing chase video of motorcycles or automobiles (within reason). Because of its size and more sophisticated subject tracking, the Mavic 3 has an advantage in one-person operation in challenging regions.
However, the Inspire 2 has the advantage in speed and power and automated tracking that shouldn’t be overlooked if you can’t find a camera operator.
- 40-46 minutes for Mavic 3
- 23-27 minutes Inspire 2
It’s impossible to ignore how difficult it is to live with the Inspire 2’s batteries. It’s the price you pay for being able to move an interchangeable lens camera — physically and metaphorically – but it only manages half the lift time.
The Inspire 2 comes with a battery charger the size of a soft drink can with slots for up to four batteries, but only two pairs are included. Only the Premium Combo version of the Mavic 3 Cine is available, including a three-battery charging hub.
Given how much of any flight is spent returning and replacing batteries, the Mavic 3 is far more convenient to fly.
The Inspire 2 and Mavic 3 have fundamentally different mindsets; on the Mavic 3, the camera and gimbal are integrated into the drone, but on the Inspire 2, the camera unit is detachable and contains the gimbal.
The Zenmuse X5S or X7 are the most popular choices among videographers and photographers because they allow lens swapping. The X4S, a cheaper all-in-one camera gimbal unit with no interchangeable lenses, was also available at launch, but DJI no longer sells it.
If you choose the Zenmuse X5S or X7, you’ll have a lens that can follow a subject almost always while the drone hovers. However, because you can always yaw the entire aircraft, an experienced solo operator may not require this capability. The Inspire 2’s gimbal couldn’t tilt as high as the Mavic 3’s, which can tilt up to 100 degrees.
The gimbal on the Mavic 3 can roll further to compensate for the aircraft’s lean (an automatic process), while the Inspire leans less and has physical dampers at the gimbal mount, so its lower limit is less significant; in use, neither aircraft is easy to push beyond horizontal footage.
The shape of the camera block on the Mavic 3 may cause some anxiety about adding filters. However, the Cine pack includes a set of built-to-fit ND filters. Finding a polarizer may be more difficult, but Inspire 2 owners will also require filters for each lens and a screw-in weight to balance some lenses — all of which are additional expenditures.
Range And Controller
The Mavic 3 Cine Premium bundle includes the DJI RC Pro, a remote that costs $999 / £879 and has a bright built-in display. It also has superior control sticks than the regular Mavic 3 remote, which are adopted from the DJI FPV and equivalent to the Inspire 2 remote’s longer pro-style sticks.
The 5.5-inch screen is adequate, if not as large as the iPad Mini, which is frequently used with an Inspire 2 controller, and the 1000-nit brightness is excellent outside. The entire device is an updated version of the original Mavic’s’smart controller,’ which means Android runs underneath with file movement and screen recording tools and a microSD card port.
Unfortunately, for a direct comparison, the Inspire 2 controller is also a world of choice; there’s the option of a customizable pro device, the DJI Cendence remote, manual focus control, and a CrystalSky monitor, but that gets into a world of extra detail that essentially serves to emphasize the key additional features that the Inspire 2 remote – of whatever stripe – offers over and above the Mavic 3 – master and slave operation.
There is an HDMI out on the back of every Inspire 2 remote for 1080i50 or 720p60 live broadcast and the connection to a display device – either DJI’s or your phone or iPad mini.
The Mavic 3 Cine’s HDMI out (through a remote connection on the RC Pro) was previously plagued with on-screen display (OSD), but this has been rectified in the updated firmware, which now supports 1080p60fps and provides a better live view while flying.
For those on a budget, the Cine has no evident advantage over the normal Mavic 3 for shooting stills; you’ve got the identical imaging technology, and the SSD speed isn’t a huge difference. The Cine bundle contains ND filters and the RC Pro, but the Fly More kit also includes ND filters if you plan to fly the drone with your device.
The Inspire 2 provides a lot of flexibility without compromising the interchangeable lenses. The Olympus EZ 14-42mm Micro Four Thirds lens is a popular choice because it’s inexpensive and offers zoom controllable at a distance – the zoom is of the same quality throughout the range.
In contrast, the Mavic 3’s additional tele camera is more of a research tool, allowing you to see a long-distance but at the expense of quality and even shooting options. It’s still beneficial, and the results will impress if you don’t overuse the digital zoom and keep realistic expectations.
Both cameras (assuming you choose the Zenmuse X5S with the Inspire 2) have essentially the same sensor size and all of the expected capabilities like exposure bracketing, timed pictures, and so on. The Mavic 3’s longer hover time and faster pack up can be advantageous in many situations.
Still, the Inspire 2’s flexibility to add a reasonably inexpensive optical zoom to your pack (as well as choose from a few other less modest options) gives you more creative freedom.
The Zenmuse X7 has a substantially larger sensor and even higher resolution. However, only four DJI lenses are supported, ranging in focal length from 16mm to 50mm.
This is, in many respects, the crux of the contrast. Is the Mavic 3 Cine small enough to compete? The response will be a resounding yes for many users.
The Mavic 3 Cine has the same resolution as the Inspire 2 with the X5S resolution (the X7 is clearly out of reach in terms of specs, but 6K is rarely necessary). It’s also a pain when it comes to making sure you can use the full resolution on the Inspire 2.
While the ProRes 422 HQ license and a fixed 1TB SSD are included in the ‘Cine’ version of the Mavic 3, not every Inspire 2 is sold with SSD cards, and high-speed storage is required for the higher bit rates that ProRes 422 HQ and CinemaDNG record at, as well as the costly license(s) for these formats (if not bought in a bundle).
On the other hand, the Cine has a strict 1TB limit before you need to move the content to another location; Inspire 2 users can buy more SSD cards and empty them later, albeit DJI’s standard is frustrating.
When purchasing a drone, there is one feature that is sometimes overlooked. Remember that you may legally fly consumer/prosumer/pro drones beyond line of sight practically nowhere in the world. Sure, some corporations have gotten clearance to do so in the past, but only under the strictest conditions and a sizable safety team.
The more prominent form factor of the Inspire 2 helps with visibility in this situation. Do you require images of a primary commercial construction site? The Mavic 3 (despite its impressive 15-kilometer range) can only be seen for a few hundred feet at most. So you can’t fly it higher than a few hundred feet lawfully.
The Inspire 2 can be seen from a long distance, making it a better choice for professionals who don’t want to use many spotters on the same task.
It also features some bright LED lights on the front and back that can be seen far away.
The DJI Inspire 2 can handle far higher wind speeds than the Mavic 3 due to its larger size, weight, and power. It’s also less prone to ballooning up and down with wind gusts because of the more significant weight, which keeps it more stable.
The Mavic 3, despite being swift and responsive, has a significantly harder time staying stationary in severe gusts than the Inspire 2, owing to its smaller weight.
Despite hailing from the same parent company, the Inspire 2 and Mavic 3 (Cine and regular) offer very different user experiences; the Inspire is one of the last drones to use DJI’s ‘Go 4’ app, while the Mavic 3 has followed the consumer herd to ‘DJI Fly.’
This is a mixed blessing; while the Mavic 3 is easier to move to from previous DJI drones in the current range, the professional community still prefers the Go 4’s functionality and presentation.
While it’s true that Go 4 has the upper hand, we believe that some of the rages stem from a fear of change. Everything you need to record video and take essential manual control is in DJI Fly. However, the latter appears to hide manual adjustment in the lower corner, whereas Go 4 may take up a third of the screen with good click-and-drag dials, making it faster and more natural for experts.
The Mavic 3 appears to offer more in terms of subject tracking. However, the software isn’t nearly as mature as we’d want (it still seems to struggle to identify subjects). Both can track a vehicle from a distance of 30 meters or less, albeit the Mavic 3 may have a slight advantage in taking a side-on position, while the Inspire can turn its lens faster due to the hanging gimbal.
Both offer collision avoidance, but the Mavic 3 wins because, unlike the Inspire, it can see in all directions, calculate departure for obstacles (we tried small tree branches moving in the wind) and stay ‘on a mission.’
The Mavic 3 also offers modern DJI features like ‘QuickShots’ and ‘Master shots,’ which can be beneficial in that the drone flies (and, in the latter instance, edits) share-friendly footage for you (as of the 202 updates).
The ability to swap payloads is another feature that sets the Inspire 2 apart from the Mavic 3.
Do you have a mapping assignment to complete and require the lightest camera possible? Install the X4S camera.
Do you require some outstanding photographs and video? An excellent alternative is an X5S camera with interchangeable lenses.
Do you require a high-resolution, cinema-grade camera with a diverse lens selection? Turn on the excellent X7 camera.
The Mavic 3 has one camera that cannot be swapped (it’s a terrific camera, but your options are severely limited) with only two focal length options and a single sensor size; your choices are severely limited).
Is the Mavic 3 compatible with the smart controller?
The DJI Mavic 3 only works with the new DJI Smart Controller V2 (RC Pro) or the standard remote controller that we already know from the DJI Air 2S for video transmission.
Will the DJI Inspire 2 fly in the rain?
The bad news is that DJI’s consumer drones, including the Inspire, Phantom, Spark, and Mavic, are not designed to be flown in the rain.
Is it possible to fly the Mavic Air 2 at night?
Tonight was the first time I flew my Mavic Air 2 at night. I raised it to around 150 feet and let it fly around my area for about six minutes without incident before pressing the Return To Home button.
Is the Mavic 3 water-resistant?
The FCC database has listed DJI’s long-awaited Mavic 3 consumer drone and Action 2 waterproof camera, usually the penultimate step before a product is sold publicly.
In the end, the Dji Mavic 3 is the better drone overall. It offers more features and capabilities, and its performance is more consistent overall.
On the other hand, the Inspire 2 is an excellent option if you’re looking for a budget-friendly drone that still offers some of the most advanced features available. Staaker.com hopes this article was helpful!
Last update on 2022-06-24 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API